For qualified non-clinical research buyers, including independent researchers, educators, analysts and research teams. Not for human or veterinary use.

Research evidence guide

IGF-1 LR3 research: distinguish the analog from native IGF-I.

A cited buyer guide to Long R3 IGF-I identity, IGF-binding-protein context, receptor and cell-assay evidence, model limits and the current non-clinical research listing.

Evidence snapshotLong R3 IGF-I is an engineered IGF-I analog. Published work describes an N-terminal extension and an Arg substitution, while assay studies distinguish its binding-protein behavior from native IGF-I.[1][2]

Compare current prices and formats.

For qualified non-clinical research buyers. Not for human or veterinary use.

Disclosure: We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links.

The analog name encodes a material difference

A protein-engineering paper describes Long R3 IGF-I as an N-terminally extended IGF-I analog and identifies an Arg substitution at position 3 of the IGF-I moiety.[1] That identity is not interchangeable with native IGF-I, des(1-3)IGF-I, tagged constructs or other IGF analogs. A shorthand listing also does not establish the complete sequence, terminal state, counterion, quantity basis or seller-lot identity.

Protein-engineering evidenceSite-directed mutagenesis and pepsin-digestion work maps cleavage sites across the N-terminal extension and IGF-I moiety.[1]
Receptor-pathway evidenceA cell-signaling study measured IGF-I receptor phosphorylation after exposure to IGF-I and several analogs, including Long R3 IGF-I.[2]

Do not collapse receptor and binding-protein effects

IGF-binding proteins can change the extracellular availability of IGF ligands. One IGF1R-phosphorylation study found that IGFBP-3 inhibited signaling induced by several IGF ligands and analogs under its experimental conditions.[2] The paper also reported no direct IGFBP-3 interaction with IGF1R in its cross-linking experiment, supporting the need to distinguish ligand sequestration from receptor-level effects.

Assay boundary: receptor phosphorylation, downstream kinase activation, DNA synthesis, cell number and differentiation are separate endpoints. A result in one system is not a universal potency value or a seller-product specification.

Cell background and conditioned medium matter

In postnatal rat lung fibroblasts, Long R3 IGF-I produced a different concentration-response from IGF-I in a cell-number assay; the investigators interpreted that comparison in the context of binding proteins present in conditioned medium.[3] The reported half-maximal values belong to that cell preparation, medium, exposure window and endpoint—not to all IGF1R assays.

Binding-protein resistance is not binding-protein independence

A porcine embryonic myoblast study describes Long R3 IGF-I as having very low affinity for IGF-binding proteins while retaining IGF-receptor binding.[4] In the same model, recombinant IGFBP-5 still suppressed the measured proliferation response, which the authors interpreted as evidence of an IGF-independent IGFBP-5 action. This illustrates why “reduced affinity” must not be rewritten as “unaffected in every system.”

Pathway readouts remain model-specific

Human intestinal smooth-muscle cells were used to examine DNA-synthesis responses and IGFBP production, with inhibitor experiments implicating MAP-kinase and PI3-kinase pathways in the measured system.[5] Separately, prostate cancer cell lines were used to study telomerase and Akt-associated readouts after IGF ligands and analogs.[6] Neither cell model establishes organism-level outcomes or the performance of a current seller lot.

Analytical identity cannot be inferred from a label

A forensic case report used immunoaffinity purification, intact-protein and peptide mass spectrometry, and an immunoassay to characterize a material as His-tagged Long R3 IGF-I.[7] The extra tag and linker made that material distinct from an untagged analog. The report is a useful identity warning: product names and immunoreactivity alone do not resolve sequence modifications or lot composition.

Procurement and assay checks for IGF-1 LR3

  • Confirm the requested material is Long R3 IGF-I rather than native IGF-I, des(1-3)IGF-I, an antibody, a tagged construct or another analog.
  • Record the supplied sequence, N-terminal extension, Arg substitution, terminal state, counterion or salt when stated, quantity basis and formulation.
  • Match current lot documentation to the exact received material; literature and database records are not lot-specific evidence.
  • Define receptor species and construct, cell background, receptor density, medium and serum conditions, exposure window, endpoint and controls.
  • Record relevant IGF-binding proteins and conditioned-medium variables instead of assuming equal ligand availability across assays.
  • Keep receptor phosphorylation, downstream signaling, proliferation, differentiation and organism-level observations in separate evidence tiers.
  • Verify current seller price, availability, shipment eligibility and institutional receiving requirements before ordering.

Review the current research format

The card below uses current seller-catalog title, format, price and availability facts retrieved during generation. The literature above does not establish the identity, quality, purity, stability, performance or results of the seller product.